Six years, two verdicts, one handshake: how Chance the Rapper's manager fight ended with $35 from a jury and $1.5 million from a judge

Updated:

The long, strange legal war between Chance the Rapper (Chancelor Bennett) and his former manager Pat Corcoran — "Pat the Manager" — has ended in a split decision that reads like a law-school exam on what an unwritten agreement is actually worth. In March, a Chicago jury gave Chance exactly $35. This month, Judge James E. Hanlon Jr. gave him potentially $1.5 million more — on a completely different theory (per Digital Music News).

Act one: the jury says no contract, and awards $35

The feud began in 2020, when Corcoran sued for $3.8 million in unpaid commissions, claiming a 15% oral deal from the early days of Chance's career — including a three-year "sunset clause" that extended commissions past their split — despite the two never having signed anything (Billboard documented the filing). Chance countersued in 2021 for $1 million, alleging mishandled deals, kickbacks, and over $300,000 in excess payments.

At trial in March, per Billboard's courtroom coverage, Corcoran's attorney Robert D. Sweeney framed the case as loyalty betrayed: "This story is about someone who becomes famous and forgets what it took to get him there." His evidence included the resume — Coloring Book's 125 weeks on the Billboard 200, the three Grammys, all under Corcoran's management — contrasted with Star Line's single week after the split. "You can be great, but if you don't have the right people around you, how's that going to work out?"

The jury was not moved. It rejected Corcoran's commission claims outright and sided with Chance on the countersuit — awarding him $35 in damages. Corcoran's lawyer Jay Scharkey spun it as a warning: "We respect the jury's decision, but the message to music managers is clear: Get it in writing. The jury award of $35 speaks to how seriously the jury viewed Chance's case." Chance's lawyer Precious Jacobs-Perry called it "complete vindication."

Act two: the judge finds secret profits

The October ruling, by Judge Hanlon, picked up where the jury's symbolic dollar figure left off — on the equity side of the ledger. Where the jury had been asked about contracts and commissions, the judge was looking at fiduciary duty. And there, the findings were specific and unsparing:

"Corcoran breached his duty. His merchandise company took commissions from Bennett's own vendors on Bennett's own orders, which is a secret profit. Corcoran was Bennett's agent and fiduciary. He bought goods and services with Bennett's money, dealt with vendors in Bennett's name, and carried Bennett's position into negotiations with people Bennett never met. In that sphere he owed loyalty and disclosure, and the rules about secret profits and conflicting interests apply."

Per DMN's account of the ruling, Corcoran must now surrender the covert commissions and fees — Chance's representatives estimate as much as $1.5 million — though the judge declined the heavier punitive damages Chance sought. Corcoran's spokesperson counters that "the court ruled there is no basis for Chance's claim of more than $10 million in damages" and that the court agreed Pat "performed years of valuable work that Bennett accepted and profited from, work that was not self-dealing" — leaving Chance to prove actual harm "in the very limited areas of merchandising outlined in the order."

Why the split decision matters more than either number

The two rulings together draw a line that every manager-artist dispute in modern music ends up litigating: the difference between what you were promised and what you were owed.

The jury's $35 said the promised part was a mirage — with no written contract, no commission terms could be proven, no sunset clause, nothing. That verdict protected Chance from paying the $3.8 million. But it also, notably, refused to make Corcoran pay much for the mishandling allegations. Two guys, one handshake, no paper: the jury essentially said the deal was whatever each side remembered, and memories differ.

The judge's $1.5 million said the owed part exists regardless of paper. Fiduciary duty doesn't come from a contract; it comes from the relationship itself. An agent who negotiates in his client's name, spends the client's money, and takes commissions from the client's vendors on the client's orders has breached a duty he never had to sign for. That's the doctrine of secret profits, and it is one of the oldest rules in agency law. Corcoran's defense — years of valuable, accepted work — is true and irrelevant to it: you can be a brilliant manager and still owe back what you took in the shadows.

For independent artists, which Chance famously built an entire career on being — three Grammys without ever signing to a major — the lesson cuts both ways. The handshake that kept Chance out of a label's contracts also left him without the paper that would have cleanly resolved a manager dispute. "Get it in writing," Corcoran's own lawyer said, in what may be the only sentence both sides agree on. The $35 was the cost of not writing down the deal. The $1.5 million is the floor of what the law implies anyway.

Sources